ijecm.co.uk
Editorial Board - IJECM, UK
http://ijecm.co.uk/editors
Results Declared Student Research Competition *1st Prize $1000, 2nd Prize $500*. Impact Factor: GIF 0.656. Impact Factor: SJIF 4.109. Inviting papers for the upcoming issue. Need 'Lead Guest Editor' for special issues. Emeritus Professor Dr. Malcolm Christopher. Malcolm.christopher@ijecm.co.uk. Professor of International Business and Marketing, McGill University, Canada. Editor-in-Chief, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer Publication. Editor-in-Chief, Forum Scientiae Oeconomia. Dean, Gra...
nioolib.blogspot.com
NIOO Library: April 2014
http://nioolib.blogspot.com/2014_04_01_archive.html
Weblog with news and tips for users of the NIOO Library and Information Services. Tuesday, April 29, 2014. There are 2 tools for the evaluation of scientific journals. Both tools depend on the reviews by researchers themselves. The first tools covers all journals, the second tool just covers journals for Open Access. Was introduced by Adam Etking. read more on their website or in Scholarly Kitchen. And there is an 'independent' evaluator who acquired informaton from users " Journal Reviewer.
chrisamiller.com
BioBits
http://chrisamiller.com/science
Cleaning up after yourself. It turns out that when you sort bams with sambamba, it uses /tmp/ instead of the working directory (who knew! So, long story short, I ended up with temp dirs filled or half-filled on a bunch of the blades in our LSF-managed cluster. To clean up the mess, my first instinct was just to write a little bash script that removed the appropriate directories owned by me, then loop through each blade like so:. Bhosts awk '{print $1}' while read i;do. Ssh $i bash /cleanup.sh. To ignore ...
rubriqblog.wordpress.com
Rubriq partners with writeLaTeX | Rubriq Blog
https://rubriqblog.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/rubriq-partners-with-writelatex
Back to rubriq.com. Reviewer motivation: observations from Rubriq. Rubriq adds Sound Research Stamps →. June 16, 2014 · 2:07 pm. Rubriq partners with writeLaTeX. We’re excited to announce a new partnership with another top innovator in tools for researchers, writeLaTeX. The official press release follows below. If you aren’t familiar with their new Overleaf system, go to www.writelatex.com/overleaf. WriteLaTeX partners with Rubriq to offer its authors direct access to pre-submission peer review services.
chemconnector.com
AltMetrics « ChemConnector Blog
http://www.chemconnector.com/category/altmetrics
Helping to Create Connections in Chemistry. Archive for category AltMetrics. The confusing world of Altmetrics – A personal opinion, with confusing data. On February 15, 2016. Let’s take for example the recent Zika Virus article that Sean Ekins led. If we use the Altmetric Bookmarklet we can navigate to the page with a score. The score of “41” is essentially the sum of bloggers, tweets, Facebook posts etc. summarized below (1 1 1 33 1 3 1 for being on Altmetric.com? 8220;, part of which is shown below.
anothersb.blogspot.com
Yes, Another Science Blog: December 2014
http://anothersb.blogspot.com/2014_12_01_archive.html
Yes, Another Science Blog. Wednesday, December 10, 2014. I just flew into Paris for a single day of the Axon@LeWeb. Event I presented our protocols.io. A I support enthusiastically Victor Henning’s effort to showcase science startups. In a sea of interesting general-audience companies at LeWeb. There is no way that an amazing company like Publons. Software for reproducible R&D. S: research and development of biological systems, sensors, diagnostics, and instrumentation. Subscribe to: Posts (Atom).
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
What Motivates Reviewers? An Experiment in Economics | The Scholarly Kitchen
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/05/28/what-motivates-reviewers-an-experiment-in-economics
What's Hot and What's Cooking in Scholarly Publishing – from the Society for Scholarly Publishing. An Experiment in Economics. Posted by Phil Davis. May 28, 2014. Journal of Public Economics. Incentives (Photo credit: opensourceway). 8220;It takes a researcher 3-5 hours to review a manuscript,” editors quip, “whether you give him/her a week or six months! In the early 1990’s, economists were playing with the idea of paying reviewers to speed up the process ( Mason, 1992. Banking model proposed for ecology.
simsocsci.blogspot.com
Simulating the Social Processes of Science: April 2015
http://simsocsci.blogspot.com/2015_04_01_archive.html
Sunday, 12 April 2015. Submission dealing for special session extended to 27th April. The deadline for all Social Simulation submissions, including for those for the special session on simulating the social processes of science, have the deadline extended to 27th April. Thursday, 9 April 2015. Paper: "Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation". A review article in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. Coming out of the LiquidPub. Move Scientific Report (already an offshoot ...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT