ppenetwork.org
Faculty Websites | Philosophy Politics and Economics Network
http://ppenetwork.org/sample-faculty-websites
Skip to main content. Philosophy Politics and Economics Network. Starting a PPE Program. About the PPENetwork.org. About the PPENetwork.org. Join the PPE Network. About the PPENetwork.org. By uploading your books, research papers, presentations and other content into the PPE Network, you are building your PPE Profile. Your PPE profile can be used to create a customizable personal website. Get a Faculty Website. About the PPE Network. Faculty and Graduate Student Profiles. Choice of responsive designs.
reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com
Reasonable Disagreement: Intellectual honesty and the ethical requirements of blogging
http://reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com/2013/05/intellectual-honesty-and-ethical.html
Monday, May 27, 2013. Intellectual honesty and the ethical requirements of blogging. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom). Books We are Reading. Timothy Williamson, Knowledge and Its Limits (2000). David Chalmers, The Character of Consciousness. Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity. Joseph Raz, Engaging Reason (1999). Facts and other stubborn things. Formal Methods in Political Philosophy. Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog. New Books in Philosophy. Political Theory - Habermas and Rawls. Roderick T. Long.
reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com
Reasonable Disagreement: Hart and the rule of recognition
http://reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com/2010/11/hart-and-rule-of-recognition.html
Sunday, November 21, 2010. Hart and the rule of recognition. In the Concept of Law. HLA Hart set forth his theory of the rule of recognition. An interesting aspect of this idea is that it attempts to solve a problem of legal validity/authority (the “chicken or egg” problem) by introducing an observable practice among officials and subjects as the foundation of all legal systems. When one is confronted with a rule R claiming legal authority, a question arises: “what gives this rule R authority? He states ...
peasoup.typepad.com
PEA Soup: Character
http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/character
A blog dedicated to p. Thics, and a. Subscribe to PEA Soup. Subscribe to PEA Soup Comments. Subscribe to PEA Soup by Email. Some Of Our Books. Douglas W. Portmore. Peter A. Graham. Robert N. Johnson. William J. FitzPatrick. Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup. Parfit's Climbing the Mountain. Philosophy of Law/Legal Theory. Posts by Adrienne Martin. Posts by Alec Walen. Posts by Andrew Sepielli. Posts by Ann Cudd. Posts by Antti Kauppinen. Posts by Avia Pasternak. Posts by Ben Bradley. Posts by Brad Cokelet.
peasoup.typepad.com
PEA Soup: Gender
http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/gender
A blog dedicated to p. Thics, and a. Subscribe to PEA Soup. Subscribe to PEA Soup Comments. Subscribe to PEA Soup by Email. Some Of Our Books. Douglas W. Portmore. Peter A. Graham. Robert N. Johnson. William J. FitzPatrick. Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup. Parfit's Climbing the Mountain. Philosophy of Law/Legal Theory. Posts by Adrienne Martin. Posts by Alec Walen. Posts by Andrew Sepielli. Posts by Ann Cudd. Posts by Antti Kauppinen. Posts by Avia Pasternak. Posts by Ben Bradley. Posts by Brad Cokelet.
peasoup.typepad.com
PEA Soup: Instructions for Contributors
http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/instructions-for-contributors.html
A blog dedicated to p. Thics, and a. Subscribe to PEA Soup. Subscribe to PEA Soup Comments. Subscribe to PEA Soup by Email. Some Of Our Books. Douglas W. Portmore. Peter A. Graham. Robert N. Johnson. William J. FitzPatrick. Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup. Parfit's Climbing the Mountain. Philosophy of Law/Legal Theory. Posts by Adrienne Martin. Posts by Alec Walen. Posts by Andrew Sepielli. Posts by Ann Cudd. Posts by Antti Kauppinen. Posts by Avia Pasternak. Posts by Ben Bradley. Posts by Brad Cokelet.
peasoup.typepad.com
PEA Soup: Action Theory
http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/action-theory
A blog dedicated to p. Thics, and a. Subscribe to PEA Soup. Subscribe to PEA Soup Comments. Subscribe to PEA Soup by Email. Some Of Our Books. Douglas W. Portmore. Peter A. Graham. Robert N. Johnson. William J. FitzPatrick. Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup. Parfit's Climbing the Mountain. Philosophy of Law/Legal Theory. Posts by Adrienne Martin. Posts by Alec Walen. Posts by Andrew Sepielli. Posts by Ann Cudd. Posts by Antti Kauppinen. Posts by Avia Pasternak. Posts by Ben Bradley. Posts by Brad Cokelet.
reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com
Reasonable Disagreement: Moral Machines
http://reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com/2012/11/moral-machines.html
Wednesday, November 28, 2012. Interesting hypothetical that will eventually become relevant. Thoughts? Http:/ peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2012/11/moral-machines-from-whose-point-of-view.html. Moral Machines- From Whose Point of View. Marcus points out that the computers that control cars will have to make such judgment calls in a split second. My concern is: how should they do it? In particular, whose perspective should they take on? Should your car take your perspective, as though it is your agent?
reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com
Reasonable Disagreement: Quote of the Day
http://reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com/2012/02/quote-of-day.html
Wednesday, February 22, 2012. Quote of the Day. I highly recommend Loren Lomasky’s Libertarianism as if (the other 99 Percent of) People Mattered. 15 Social Philosophy and Policy. This article deals clearly with many issues I have been thinking about, specifically the relation between libertarianism and democracy. Here is an excerpt:. Is more generous. It is willing to concede that the nonlibertarians among whom one lives are mostly well-meaning, honorable people with whom one may cooperate without t...
reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com
Reasonable Disagreement: Deliberative vs. Participatory citizens
http://reasonabledisagreement.blogspot.com/2012/02/deliberative-vs-participatory-citizens.html
Tuesday, February 28, 2012. Deliberative vs. Participatory citizens. This is an interesting passage from Jason Brennan’s The Ethics of Voting. Let’s describe two kinds of democratic citizens. Citizens have frequent crosscutting political discussion. That is, they frequently consider and respond to contrary views. They are careful in forming their own political preferences. They are able to articulate good reasons on behalf of contrary views. They have high levels of political knowledge. Be the one truth ...
