msulrblog.wordpress.com
Can Ski Resorts Exclude Snowboarding? Federal Court Says “Yes” | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/can-ski-resorts-exclude-snowboarding-federal-court-says-yes
MSU Law Review 2.0. Can Ski Resorts Exclude Snowboarding? Federal Court Says “Yes”. By Matthew C. Piccolo. All is not well in Utah’s snowy, white slopes. Disgruntled snowboarders chose to file a federal lawsuit challenging Alta Ski Resort’s long-standing policy of allowing the resort’s customers to use skis but not snowboards. Alta is one of 120 ski resorts that operate on U.S. Forest Service lands, and the only one that limits customers to skiing. Snowboarders have a different blind spot than skiers and...
msulrblog.wordpress.com
“If I Had Asked People What They Wanted, They Would Have Said Faster Horses”: Specialty Courts & Hope for Innovative Attorneys | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/if-i-had-asked-people-what-they-wanted-they-would-have-said-faster-horses-specialty-courts-hope-for-innovative-attorneys
MSU Law Review 2.0. If I Had Asked People What They Wanted, They Would Have Said Faster Horses : Specialty Courts and Hope for Innovative Attorneys. In the past five years, prospective lawyers have endured a non-stop litany of negative stories about the dismal job market. [1]. To show how the trend toward using data, lean thinking, and predictive legal practice is already underway. Claim a commercial dispute, so potential for case overload is possible. However, results so far have been positive. Detroit ...
msulrblog.wordpress.com
Federal Judge Allows Oklahoma to Ring in the New Year with a Three-Part Lethal Injection Cocktail | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/federal-judge-allows-oklahoma-to-ring-in-the-new-year-with-a-three-part-lethal-injection-cocktail
MSU Law Review 2.0. Federal Judge Allows Oklahoma to Ring in the New Year with a Three-Part Lethal Injection Cocktail. January 7, 2015. Laquo; Previous Post. Next Post ». The expressed herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Michigan State Law Review. Blog at WordPress.com.
msulrblog.wordpress.com
Vanity License Plates Stir Up Free Speech Issues | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/vanity-license-plates-stir-up-free-speech-issues
MSU Law Review 2.0. Vanity License Plates Stir Up Free Speech Issues. A recent vanity-license-plate case,. Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. Among other topics, the Fifth Circuit considered two notable cases prior to reaching its determination that state-issued license plates are private, rather than government, speech:. Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n. Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum. The decision of the Fifth Ci...
msulrblog.wordpress.com
Moving at the Speed of Business: Lex Machina, Data, and Dedicated Business Courts | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/moving-at-the-speed-of-business-lex-machina-data-and-dedicated-business-courts
MSU Law Review 2.0. Moving at the Speed of Business: Lex Machina, Data, and Dedicated Business Courts. The business world changes rapidly, and if lawyers want to stay above water, they must change rapidly too. Unfortunately, some lawyers are trying to make their horses faster, when they really need to be building cars. In a previous post. When one opens the homepage of Lex Machina. Photo courtesy of IP Frontline. April 23, 2015. Laquo; Previous Post. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
msulrblog.wordpress.com
Financing a Judicial Election: A Candidate’s Right to Free Speech | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/financing-a-judicial-election-a-candidates-right-to-free-speech
MSU Law Review 2.0. Financing a Judicial Election: A Candidate’s Right to Free Speech. The Supreme Court has expanded the First Amendment protections to judicial candidates in the past. In 2002, in. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White. The case currently before the Supreme Court is. Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar. January 14, 2015. Laquo; Previous Post. Next Post ». The expressed herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Michigan State Law Review.
msulrblog.wordpress.com
About | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/about
MSU Law Review 2.0. Founded in September 2013, the Michigan State Law Review Blog aims to improve the Journal’s accessibility and digital profile while maintaining the quality and tradition that has defined the Journal since 1931 . . . with less footnotes. Leave a Reply x. Enter your comment here. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Address never made public). You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out. You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out.
msulrblog.wordpress.com
Paul Hadley’s Watercolors: Orphan Works or Not? | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/paul-hadleys-watercolors-orphan-works-or-not
MSU Law Review 2.0. Paul Hadley’s Watercolors: Orphan Works or Not? Adopted in 1917, the flag of Indiana. Was designed by a Mooresville, Indiana artist named Paul Hadley. Hadley was also known for his outdoor sketches and watercolors, five of which are now owned by the Indianapolis Museum of Art. Visual Artists and Galleries Association. The IMA faces an interesting problem, should they ever want to reproduce the work of this Hoosier: Who do they contact for permission? Searching for the Answers. So, for...
msulrblog.wordpress.com
The TNC (Ride-Sharing) Insurance Gap | MSU Law Review 2.0
https://msulrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/the-tnc-ride-sharing-insurance-gap
MSU Law Review 2.0. The TNC (Ride-Sharing) Insurance Gap. Ride-sharing application companies, now designated as Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), are organizations that maintain a smartphone application that prearranges trips between consumers and drivers while logged into the TNCs’ apps. TNCs are a platform through which drivers, using their personal vehicles, can accept money to drive consumers. As personal auto insurance generally has a livery exclusion for drivers accepting money. 1) the drive...
